| Basic data |
|---|
| OCA1. Surname awarded to the assessed person | Lazár |
|---|
| OCA2. Name awarded to the assessed person | Peter |
|---|
| OCA3. Degrees awarded to the assessed person | Assoc. prof. , DVM, PhD |
|---|
| OCA4. Hyperlink to the entry of the person in the Register of university staff | https://www.portalvs.sk/regzam/detail/6016 |
|---|
| OCA5. Area of assessment | study programme cynology · I. degree |
|---|
| OCA6. Category of the research/artistic/other output | scientific output |
|---|
| OCA7. Year of publication of the research/artistic/other output | 2020 |
|---|
| OCA8. ID of the record in the Central Registry of Publication Activity (CRPA) or the Central Registry of Artistic Activity (CRAA) | 212457 |
|---|
| OCA9. Hyperlink to the record in CRPA or CRAA | https://app.crepc.sk/?fn=detailBiblioFormChildWUS5V&sid=320864C80DDE34CC58989D3A59&seo=CREP%C4%8C-detail-kapitola-/-pr%C3%Adspevok |
|---|
| Characteristics of the output that is not registered in CRPA or CRAA |
|---|
| OCA10. Hyperlink to the record in another publicly accessible register, catalogue of research/ artistic/other outputs | |
|---|
| OCA11. Characteristics of the output in the format of the CRPA or the CRAA bibliographic record, if the output is not available in a publicly accessible register or catalogue of outputs | Dodržiavanie welfare zvierat na vybraných skúškach poľovných psov na Slovensku. Karolová, RenátaTakáčová, DanielaLazár, PeterIglódyová, AdrianaBarbušinová, Eva In: Ochrana zvířat a welfare 2020 s. 155-158 |
|---|
| OCA12. Type of the output (if the output is not registered in CRPA or CRAA) | article |
|---|
| OCA13. Hyperlink to the webpage where the output is available (full text, other documentation, etc.) | |
|---|
| OCA14. Characteristics of the author's contribution | Co-author of this output. |
|---|
| OCA15. Annotation of the output with contextual information concerning the description of creative process and the content of the research/artistic/other activity, etc. | |
|---|
| Other data |
|---|
| OCA16. Annotation of the output in English | We compared selected disciplines of hunting dogs and evaluated an adherence to the ethical principles during those tests in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. We focused on selected trials of hounds, den trials,, special trials in water and the individual trials of scent hounds. There is a direct contact between the fox and the dog during den trials in Slovakia, whereas den trials are contactless in the Czech Republic. In case of the discipline of courage in a wild boar enclosure, the dog and the wild boar are in a direct contact while those animals are not in direct contact in the Czech Republic. In a discipline during which retrievers bring a small game from the water (the discipline called a duck´s scent on water surface a duck is released with one flight feather modified so that it cannot fly. This discipline is not a part of the trials in the Czech Republic. We also compared the individual trials of scent hounds, which take place on deliberately shot even-toed ungulates. Based on the course of above mention disciplines in Slovakia, we can state that the ethical principles as well as welfare of animals used in the tests are not observed, so we propose changes to the examination rules of the disciplines in Slovakia. |
|---|
| OCA17. List of maximum 5 most significant citations corresponding to the output | |
|---|
| OCA18. Characteristics of the output's impact on socio-economic practice | In recent years, the welfare of not only pets, but also wild animals has often been discussed in |
|---|
| OCA19. Characteristics of the output and related activities' impact on the educational process | The publication can significantly influence the study material (regulations for examinations in the den), which is used in the educational process. |
|---|